A Liverpool man has been convicted of serious copyright infringement offenses in a case highlighting the growing threat of illegal streaming devices. The individual, identified only as Mr. O’Donnell (41), pleaded guilty at Liverpool Crown Court today.
Mr. O’Donnell’s crimes involved the unauthorized distribution of devices pre-configured to access pirated content. These devices, often modified versions of legitimate streaming products, circumvent legal subscription services and deprive content creators of rightful revenue. The case underscores the significant financial losses incurred by the creative industries due to illegal streaming.
Investigation and Prosecution
Following a joint investigation by FACT, a leading anti-piracy organization, and Merseyside Police, Mr. O’Donnell was apprehended in July 2023. The investigation revealed his involvement in promoting and selling “fully loaded” Firesticks containing illegal IPTV subscriptions.
These subscriptions offered unauthorized access to premium content broadcasted by major providers like Sky and TNT Sports. Mr. O’Donnell employed various methods to facilitate these illegal sales, including social media platforms, direct contact, and even personal deliveries.
Court Imposes Sentence
The court imposed a two-year suspended prison sentence on Mr. O’Donnell, along with a mandatory requirement to complete 150 hours of unpaid work. This outcome serves as a stark warning to others who might contemplate similar criminal activity.
Authorities Vow Continued Action
Both FACT and Merseyside Police emphasized their unwavering commitment to pursuing such cases and holding perpetrators accountable. Detective Inspector Steve Frame from Merseyside Police reiterated their intention to “work tirelessly with FACT to identify and prosecute anyone involved in this form of intellectual property theft.”
Firesticks Not the Issue
It’s crucial to understand that Firesticks themselves are legal and readily available for purchase. The illegality lies solely in modifying them to access unauthorized content.
This case exemplifies the ongoing fight against sophisticated illegal streaming operations that threaten the creative economy. The court’s decision sends a clear message that such activities will be met with serious consequences.